I'm insanely good at History.

My U.S History class is a celebration of American obscurity.
And I'm blowing through it easily, and it's a college level course.
I haven't opened the textbook once and I can answer every single question easily, I'm actually one of the few people that can sleep through that class and absolutely demolish the tests.


Anyway, do you have a particularly subject that you're very good at?

Psychology, History, Math, Huma Biology, Economic Geography, English, Literature, Physic(sp?).

Everything.

Galenth Dysley wrote:

Everything.

No one is good at f'kin Stoichiometry.

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Galenth Dysley wrote:

Everything.

No one is good at f'kin Stoichiometry.

I'll say it again...

Everything.

Galenth Dysley wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Galenth Dysley wrote:

Everything.

No one is good at f'kin Stoichiometry.

I'll say it again...

Everything.

I am also very good at every class, except for a few cases (F'kin Stoichiometry, thank God that's over).
I'm just a procrastinator, and that bites me in the arse later on.
Like now, I should be writing a book analysis, but I'm not.

But still, f'kin stoichiometry.

All sorts of sciences (minus biology/anatomy)... Math, Philosophy, some psychology, Fitness and Exercise, and surprisingly economics (tho I hate it with a passion), also computer sciences.

Not so good with:
- Biology/Anatomy
- English/Literature
- History

Scott Chain wrote:

All sorts of sciences (minus biology/anatomy)... Math, Philosophy, some psychology, Fitness and Exercise, and surprisingly economics (tho I hate it with a passion), also computer sciences.

Not so good with:
- Biology/Anatomy
- English/Literature
- History

I have learned that Literature just requires obscene amounts of bullshitting, nothing else is really needed.

I easily get 100%'s on Essays just by BS'ing the hell out of them.

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Galenth Dysley wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Galenth Dysley wrote:

Everything.

No one is good at f'kin Stoichiometry.

I'll say it again...

Everything.

I am also very good at every class, except for a few cases (F'kin Stoichiometry, thank God that's over).
I'm just a procrastinator, and that bites me in the arse later on.
Like now, I should be writing a book analysis, but I'm not.

But still, f'kin stoichiometry.

I must design (flowchart) two (small) games (they don't have to be video game) before 11:59pm EST this up-and-coming Sunday for my Game Design 1 class.

And, I've yet to start. Meaning... I'm also a procrastinator.

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Scott Chain wrote:

All sorts of sciences (minus biology/anatomy)... Math, Philosophy, some psychology, Fitness and Exercise, and surprisingly economics (tho I hate it with a passion), also computer sciences.

Not so good with:
- Biology/Anatomy
- English/Literature
- History

I have learned that Literature just requires obscene amounts of bullshitting, nothing else is really needed.

I easily get 100%'s on Essays just by BS'ing the hell out of them.

Same here... but that's because most of the classes I write reports for aren't literature classes.

History and English/Literature.

My two strongest classes.

Galenth Dysley wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Galenth Dysley wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Galenth Dysley wrote:

Everything.

No one is good at f'kin Stoichiometry.

I'll say it again...

Everything.

I am also very good at every class, except for a few cases (F'kin Stoichiometry, thank God that's over).
I'm just a procrastinator, and that bites me in the arse later on.
Like now, I should be writing a book analysis, but I'm not.

But still, f'kin stoichiometry.

I must design (flowchart) two (small) games (does not have to be video games) before 11:59pm EST this up-and-coming Sunday for my Game Design 1 class.

And, I've yet to start. Meaning... I'm also a procrastinator.

I have to make 35 thin sections, run them through an SEM, and write up descriptions by next Tuesday... wanna trade?

Galenth Dysley wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Galenth Dysley wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Galenth Dysley wrote:

Everything.

No one is good at f'kin Stoichiometry.

I'll say it again...

Everything.

I am also very good at every class, except for a few cases (F'kin Stoichiometry, thank God that's over).
I'm just a procrastinator, and that bites me in the arse later on.
Like now, I should be writing a book analysis, but I'm not.

But still, f'kin stoichiometry.

I must design (flowchart) two (small) games (they don't have to be video game) before 11:59pm EST this up-and-coming Sunday for my Game Design 1 class.

And, I've yet to start. Meaning... I'm also a procrastinator.

Challenging me to a procrastination competition is simply something you do not want to do.

Scott Chain wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Scott Chain wrote:

All sorts of sciences (minus biology/anatomy)... Math, Philosophy, some psychology, Fitness and Exercise, and surprisingly economics (tho I hate it with a passion), also computer sciences.

Not so good with:
- Biology/Anatomy
- English/Literature
- History

I have learned that Literature just requires obscene amounts of bullshitting, nothing else is really needed.

I easily get 100%'s on Essays just by BS'ing the hell out of them.

Same here... but that's because most of the classes I write reports for aren't literature classes.

I have to keep switching between writing paradigms.
Each of my AP classes requires a different style of writing.
Biology: Dry and loooooooooooooooooooooooong
History: Extremely dry, and over-analytical.......Also long.
Literature: Fancy Schmancy

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Scott Chain wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Scott Chain wrote:

All sorts of sciences (minus biology/anatomy)... Math, Philosophy, some psychology, Fitness and Exercise, and surprisingly economics (tho I hate it with a passion), also computer sciences.

Not so good with:
- Biology/Anatomy
- English/Literature
- History

I have learned that Literature just requires obscene amounts of bullshitting, nothing else is really needed.

I easily get 100%'s on Essays just by BS'ing the hell out of them.

Same here... but that's because most of the classes I write reports for aren't literature classes.

I have to keep switching between writing paradigms.
Each of my AP classes requires a different style of writing.
Biology: Dry and loooooooooooooooooooooooong
History: Extremely dry, and over-analytical.......Also long.
Literature: Fancy Schmancy

*Glare*

I beg to differ....


I'm lieing, they are pretty boring at times.

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Scott Chain wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Scott Chain wrote:

All sorts of sciences (minus biology/anatomy)... Math, Philosophy, some psychology, Fitness and Exercise, and surprisingly economics (tho I hate it with a passion), also computer sciences.

Not so good with:
- Biology/Anatomy
- English/Literature
- History

I have learned that Literature just requires obscene amounts of bullshitting, nothing else is really needed.

I easily get 100%'s on Essays just by BS'ing the hell out of them.

Same here... but that's because most of the classes I write reports for aren't literature classes.

I have to keep switching between writing paradigms.
Each of my AP classes requires a different style of writing.
Biology: Dry and loooooooooooooooooooooooong
History: Extremely dry, and over-analytical.......Also long.
Literature: Fancy Schmancy

This is why I enjoy my science courses... everything requires one form of writing reports.

Brucil wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Scott Chain wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Scott Chain wrote:

All sorts of sciences (minus biology/anatomy)... Math, Philosophy, some psychology, Fitness and Exercise, and surprisingly economics (tho I hate it with a passion), also computer sciences.

Not so good with:
- Biology/Anatomy
- English/Literature
- History

I have learned that Literature just requires obscene amounts of bullshitting, nothing else is really needed.

I easily get 100%'s on Essays just by BS'ing the hell out of them.

Same here... but that's because most of the classes I write reports for aren't literature classes.

I have to keep switching between writing paradigms.
Each of my AP classes requires a different style of writing.
Biology: Dry and loooooooooooooooooooooooong
History: Extremely dry, and over-analytical.......Also long.
Literature: Fancy Schmancy

*Glare*

I beg to differ....


I'm lieing, they are pretty boring at times.

My teacher has gone out of his way to implant it into our heads to make it as dry and straight to the point as possible.

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Brucil wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Scott Chain wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Scott Chain wrote:

All sorts of sciences (minus biology/anatomy)... Math, Philosophy, some psychology, Fitness and Exercise, and surprisingly economics (tho I hate it with a passion), also computer sciences.

Not so good with:
- Biology/Anatomy
- English/Literature
- History

I have learned that Literature just requires obscene amounts of bullshitting, nothing else is really needed.

I easily get 100%'s on Essays just by BS'ing the hell out of them.

Same here... but that's because most of the classes I write reports for aren't literature classes.

I have to keep switching between writing paradigms.
Each of my AP classes requires a different style of writing.
Biology: Dry and loooooooooooooooooooooooong
History: Extremely dry, and over-analytical.......Also long.
Literature: Fancy Schmancy

*Glare*

I beg to differ....


I'm lieing, they are pretty boring at times.

My teacher has gone out of his way to implant it into our heads to make it as dry and straight to the point as possible.

The history classes at my School, except my Post WWII history class, have been terrible.

I mean, in Modern American (1932-1972, I think) we didn't even talk about Korea, and skipped over two incredibly important battles during WWII (Market Garden & Battle of the Bulge), along with skipping over the entire Italian Campaign and North Africa, and the Pacific Front; minus of course Iwo Jima.

Brucil wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Brucil wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Scott Chain wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Scott Chain wrote:

All sorts of sciences (minus biology/anatomy)... Math, Philosophy, some psychology, Fitness and Exercise, and surprisingly economics (tho I hate it with a passion), also computer sciences.

Not so good with:
- Biology/Anatomy
- English/Literature
- History

I have learned that Literature just requires obscene amounts of bullshitting, nothing else is really needed.

I easily get 100%'s on Essays just by BS'ing the hell out of them.

Same here... but that's because most of the classes I write reports for aren't literature classes.

I have to keep switching between writing paradigms.
Each of my AP classes requires a different style of writing.
Biology: Dry and loooooooooooooooooooooooong
History: Extremely dry, and over-analytical.......Also long.
Literature: Fancy Schmancy

*Glare*

I beg to differ....


I'm lieing, they are pretty boring at times.

My teacher has gone out of his way to implant it into our heads to make it as dry and straight to the point as possible.

The history classes at my School, except my Post WWII history class, have been terrible.

I mean, in Modern American (1932-1972, I think) we didn't even talk about Korea, and skipped over two incredibly important battles during WWII (Market Garden & Battle of the Bulge), along with skipping over the entire Italian Campaign and North Africa, and the Pacific Front; minus of course Iwo Jima.

Same here, it's pretty watered down... Well, that's what happens when you try to cover so much in so little time.

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Brucil wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Brucil wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Scott Chain wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Scott Chain wrote:

All sorts of sciences (minus biology/anatomy)... Math, Philosophy, some psychology, Fitness and Exercise, and surprisingly economics (tho I hate it with a passion), also computer sciences.

Not so good with:
- Biology/Anatomy
- English/Literature
- History

I have learned that Literature just requires obscene amounts of bullshitting, nothing else is really needed.

I easily get 100%'s on Essays just by BS'ing the hell out of them.

Same here... but that's because most of the classes I write reports for aren't literature classes.

I have to keep switching between writing paradigms.
Each of my AP classes requires a different style of writing.
Biology: Dry and loooooooooooooooooooooooong
History: Extremely dry, and over-analytical.......Also long.
Literature: Fancy Schmancy

*Glare*

I beg to differ....


I'm lieing, they are pretty boring at times.

My teacher has gone out of his way to implant it into our heads to make it as dry and straight to the point as possible.

The history classes at my School, except my Post WWII history class, have been terrible.

I mean, in Modern American (1932-1972, I think) we didn't even talk about Korea, and skipped over two incredibly important battles during WWII (Market Garden & Battle of the Bulge), along with skipping over the entire Italian Campaign and North Africa, and the Pacific Front; minus of course Iwo Jima.

Same here, it's pretty watered down... Well, that's what happens when you try to cover so much in so little time.

True.

But from my point of view, all the battles schools talk about during WWII have been explained many times before, so we should be talking about unheard of battles, that where extremely important.

Brucil wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Brucil wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Brucil wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Scott Chain wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

Scott Chain wrote:

All sorts of sciences (minus biology/anatomy)... Math, Philosophy, some psychology, Fitness and Exercise, and surprisingly economics (tho I hate it with a passion), also computer sciences.

Not so good with:
- Biology/Anatomy
- English/Literature
- History

I have learned that Literature just requires obscene amounts of bullshitting, nothing else is really needed.

I easily get 100%'s on Essays just by BS'ing the hell out of them.

Same here... but that's because most of the classes I write reports for aren't literature classes.

I have to keep switching between writing paradigms.
Each of my AP classes requires a different style of writing.
Biology: Dry and loooooooooooooooooooooooong
History: Extremely dry, and over-analytical.......Also long.
Literature: Fancy Schmancy

*Glare*

I beg to differ....


I'm lieing, they are pretty boring at times.

My teacher has gone out of his way to implant it into our heads to make it as dry and straight to the point as possible.

The history classes at my School, except my Post WWII history class, have been terrible.

I mean, in Modern American (1932-1972, I think) we didn't even talk about Korea, and skipped over two incredibly important battles during WWII (Market Garden & Battle of the Bulge), along with skipping over the entire Italian Campaign and North Africa, and the Pacific Front; minus of course Iwo Jima.

Same here, it's pretty watered down... Well, that's what happens when you try to cover so much in so little time.

True.

But from my point of view, all the battles schools talk about during WWII have been explained many times before, so we should be talking about unheard of battles, that where extremely important.

History classes usually assume you have no prior experience with a history class.

Mon Pandamari wrote:

History classes usually assume you have no prior experience with a history class.

Yes.


But I'm sure almost everyone has heard of D-Day and Iwo Jima.


Especially Omaha beach.

Brucil wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

History classes usually assume you have no prior experience with a history class.

Yes.


But I'm sure almost everyone has heard of D-Day and Iwo Jima.


Especially Omaha beach.

But not everybody. It also depends, I have several friends that don't care about history, but I know Roman, Greek, Nordic history, to name a few. I'm the only one that can name at least 5 greek gods.(I can name up to 20 without trouble, but I think that my classmates can only namer 3, let alone 5)

Brucil wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

History classes usually assume you have no prior experience with a history class.

Yes.


But I'm sure almost everyone has heard of D-Day and Iwo Jima.


Especially Omaha beach.

D-Day is a maybe.

Iwo Jima and Omaha beach.... are probably nots.

Malcom Malorne wrote:

Brucil wrote:

Mon Pandamari wrote:

History classes usually assume you have no prior experience with a history class.

Yes.


But I'm sure almost everyone has heard of D-Day and Iwo Jima.


Especially Omaha beach.

But not everybody. It also depends, I have several friends that don't care about history, but I know Roman, Greek, Nordic history, to name a few. I'm the only one that can name at least 5 greek gods.(I can name up to 20 without trouble, but I think that my classmates can only namer 3, let alone 5)

The Greek Gods aren't really my thing, but I'll see how well I do.
Zeus.
Hera
Hermes
Hades
Poseidon
Aphrodite
Artemis
Dionysus
Apollo
Helios
Athena
Ares
Demeter
Prometheus? (not sure about him)

I could name more if Titans and Pre-Pantheon Gods are allowed.